| The programming
process that takes place between conventions varies by the choices
made by officers, among divisions, and across time as the central
process changes. This note is to explain how it worked for RTVJ
Division for '03-'04 and why some decisions were made. I hope
that understanding the process will inspire members to submit
panel proposals for future conventions and step forward to serve
as an officer in the division.
As soon as I was elected in Kansas City, it was my responsibility
to appoint someone as RTVJ's liasion to RTNDA. I appointed Don
Heider and he began his term at the BEA/RTNDA/NAB meeting in
the spring. Additionally, I appointed Jim Upshaw as chair of
the Bliss Award committee. It was his job to secure nominations
and gather a committee to evaluate the nominations.
In Kansas City, the RTVJ officers met to brainstorm panel
ideas and to discuss deadlines. The officers unanimously decided
to not have a pre-convention workshop. All the officers expected
to both create panels and urge others to submit panel proposals.
In addition to work by the Teaching Chair and the PF&R
Chair, Anthony Moretti, then Vice-Head and Program Chair, and
I worked together to encourage people to submit panel proposals.
We aimed to meet an October 3 deadline for panel proposals to
be submitted. We asked that panel proposals have at least two
panelists who were confirmed to be on the panel if it was programmed.
After Moretti received all of the panel proposals, he circulated
them among the RTVJ officers for rank ordering. Moretti took
the rank ordered proposals, considered teaching and PF&R
balance and submitted a selection of the submitted panels to
circulate among all of the AEJMC program planners in divisions
and interest groups. According to the RTVJ charter, he didn't
need to do that. As the Vice-Head and Program Chair, he could
have just picked the ones he liked, or the ones he thought the
membership would enjoy. He made a decision that involved all
of the officers in the selection of the panels that had been
proposed.
The RTVJ panels were sent to AEJMC by November 1st and the
packet of all of the panel proposals was then circulated among
all the heads and vice heads. Moretti went to work to secure
co-sponsors for RTVJ panels. Co-sponsorship extends the quantity
of panels in which RTVJ participates, however, in does not extend
the number of RTVJ members who participate in panels.
RTVJ programmers could choose to program all sole sponsored
panels. Currently, the only carrot for co-sponsorship is AEJMC
speaker funding. To secure funding for speakers the panel must
be co-sponsored. (In past years, co-sponsored panels were placed
on the program grid before sole sponsored panels.)
Moretti had done such a good job of securing co-sponsors that
our experience at the December programming meeting was perfectly
smooth. We left the meeting with a full slate of programming
for the Toronto convention. He worked hard with other programmers
in subsequent weeks to secure the details of the panelists and
to write or monitor the writing of program copy.
In January, I submitted a request for speaker funding. In
March, Moretti submitted program copy.
In June, we proofed the program copy.
So, this gives you an idea of the work involved and when it
needs to be completed.
| What
Happens When |
|
| September |
Create
panel ideas and secure panelists |
| October |
Program
Head gathers and formats panels |
| November
1 |
Send
RTVJ panel proposals to AEJMC-HQ |
| December |
AEJMC
programming meeting |
| January |
RTVJ
funding requests to AEJMC-HQ |
| March |
Program
copy due |
| April
1 |
Research
paper deadline |
| June |
Proof
program copy |
|